It's all about presentation.
TheDamian's presentation of Lingua::tlhInganHol::yIghun is very entertaining, and I believe that nobody looks for much more beyond it than its entertainment value.
Your presentation of your "unique method" does not define your "unique method", and it seems to be just another way of embedding some tagged language that is not even Perl into your web page templates. At least that is still the impression I get from your posts. This is something that HTML::Mason has already done, as has PLP, as has Template::Toolkit, in various levels of depth/integration.
What would make your approach interesting to me would be a detailed comparison of the commonalities and differences between your "unique method" and the existing methods, so I can easily gauge why you think that your "unique method" is better than the existing methods I know well. As you have not demonstrated knowledge of the existing tools, I'm unwilling to invest time into learning your tool, just to find out that it does what the other tools do as well, but different.
But then, I told the same thing to you already, so the people telling you that you're not listening to their advice might be correct.
Update Fixed typo, spotted by ig
In reply to Re: Why is it?
by Corion
in thread Why is it?
by simonodell
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |