Even if you are the one in the right (who am I to doubt that, as I don't use anything close to what you are talking about, so why should I care), sharing a thought is something quite different than sharing code/examples, so others can judge on actual "stuff". When you are talking about a level of abstraction, it is quite possible this stays very abstract to a lot of the readers. If I would say that I found a way to reverse magnetism in a confined space, you wouldn't believe me until you saw what or how I did it. I cannot convince you of the opposite by just saying I did and how great I am and that you just have to believe me because I am the best. Well, I am not the best, and I do share my code (unless forbidden by law). I hope people come up with comments: both positive and negative. I take gratitude in the positive comments and learn from the negative. That is how others do perceive my implementation(s). Maybe I'm right, sometimes I am wrong, but when I am right, I am now forced to find a eloquative answer that will explain why my thought is right. I don't say "you are wrong. period." that doesn't help either of us.
I'm sure you made something great, otherwise you wouldn't talk about it here that much. But as long as the readers don't have anything to look at, there reactions are expectable.
In reply to Re^5: Pulling Punches
by Tux
in thread Pulling Punches
by simonodell
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |