Ignoring the confusing for, I'd also point out that spawning uname is completely unnecessary. Everything that code does can be done by useing Config.pm and interrogating %Config.
Maybe I should add architecture stuff to Devel::CheckOS.
In reply to Re: for loop ?
by DrHyde
in thread for loop ?
by stevensw
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |