John, this stuff gets a bit tricky because what I've done is write a code generator.
I don't understand why you need to localize the backref variables.
Because if the match fails on the current attempt, but it succeeded on a previous attempt, the backref variables ($1, $2, etc) will contain the values from the previous match. The following code demonstrates this:
my $string = '1234'; $string =~ /(2)/; $string =~ /(a)/; print $1;
Also, you're finding the first capture, not the last.
I misread your post then. Make the following change:
- for ( 1 .. $num_refs ) { + for ( $num_refs .. 1 ) {
Here is a way that finds the max by itself...
I didn't know about the @+ variable :)
In your new code, you are localizing the same name as you are my-ing.
Actually, I'm not. Before the eval statement, add the statement print $code;. That will show you what's going on. The HERE document is a scalar containing generated code to be evaled. That's all.
As I mentioned, my code is probably not worth the effort as I did not know about @+. :)
Update 2: Duh! Of course $num_refs .. 1 isn't going to work. Sigh.
Cheers,
Ovid
Vote for paco!
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to (Ovid) Re(3): What's like $+ but not gives the ordinal?
by Ovid
in thread What's like $+ but not gives the ordinal?
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |