I'd prefer the use of code to determine if the platform is unsupported over trying to standardize a data format for such declarations [for example, you might declare a platform as unsupported because it lacks the quantumflux.h file or because the quantumflux.h files does not define entangle() or because there is no /proc/torhock present].
Plus, the use of code to make such determinations is already supported, it just isn't documented sufficiently conveniently.
- tye
In reply to Re^3: CPAN Smoke Tests: Some platforms are meant to be broken (code over data)
by tye
in thread CPAN Smoke Tests: Some platforms are meant to be broken
by saintmike
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |