Let's focus on step 2
shift->SUPER::new(@_)Here the result of shift should be son,right?
then shift->SUPER::new should still call father::new,right?
In reply to Re^2: Why doesn't SUPER cause dead loop here?
by PerlOnTheWay
in thread Why doesn't SUPER cause dead loop here?
by PerlOnTheWay
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |