I have a record of a certain number of fields, I know the fields, but I only know the field values in the code; the total set of values for each field is unknown
The way I had originally planned was a large hash array, with the field values implemented in the hash, and the value I want held in the hash:
my $h={ j=>{b=>"some value meaningful to another part of code"}};
so
return $h->{$l_id}->{$letter_code}
if (defined $h->{$l_id}->{$letter_code});
however, this becomes difficult when you have a value
my $h = {j=>{b=>{c=>"some other meaningful value"}}};
but this
my $h = {j=>{b=>{c=>1}}};
makes the code mysterious even to me, and I'm inventing the damn thing.
The other problem is that I have a few != clauses; I can't model these in the hash because I don't know the total set of values for that group.
TIA
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.