You missed the ultimate silly extreme. No code means no bugs. Try and disprove thatThat's trivial to disprove. Most code is intended to do something. If it doesn't do what is intended to be done, it isn't correct. No code means nothing is done.
In reply to Re^4: regexp class
by JavaFan
in thread re: regexp class
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |