trivial to disprove.... If it doesn't do ...
Sorry, but your disproof has bugs.
What "it". If there is no code, there is no "it".
The absence of functionality is not a bug. In many cases, it is the most pragmatic, correct solution.
In reply to Re^5: regexp class
by BrowserUk
in thread re: regexp class
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |