No, of course it would not be an "additional feature" request. It would be an original feature request. "This code doesn't have feature $X" is not the same as "This code is buggy". Failing to implement required features makes the code incomplete. It doesn't mean the code contains any bugs.
Code being bug-free obviously does not mean that there are no features that it leaves unsatisfied.
But the empty program successfully implements the following important features:
- tye
In reply to Re^9: regexp class (no bugs)
by tye
in thread re: regexp class
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |