How ruled by petty prejudices people are.Point taken!
It's the Win32::API module that has been messed around with, and that has zip, zero, nada, nothing to do with Microsoft.My misunderstanding. I interpreted this sentence as "Since the Windows API changed a lot between Windows versions, the Win32::API module was changed often accordingly". I now see that where my mistake was.
32-bit or 64-bit? On a 32-bit or 64-bit version of which flavour of windows?Ooops, I wasn't aware of these differences. In Windows 7 it's 32-bit. With XP, I guess it's the same - before you mentioned it, I was not aware that XP was also available in a 64-bit version.
Anyway, your question to the "bitness" makes we wonder whether we could have a problem here in the future: We use the same Perl installation (with all the modules) on all platforms, whether they are Windows 2000, XP or 7. I thought that 32-bit programs can also be run on 64-bit Windows, but if this is not the case, or if we need different versions of modules (or DLLs), depending on which platform we are running, this might cause trouble one day.
If I find time, I'll research a bit into this direction...
In reply to Re^4: Win32::Process::Info question
by rovf
in thread Win32::Process::Info question
by rovf
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |