Since when has a rational, logical refutation of bad information been "garbage"? Because if that is the case, you've just condemned the entire basis of the scientific process.
If only that's all it were, that'd be awesome. Unfortunately, it was also offensive, bullying, disparaging, and a personal attack.
So why post? Why do you -- who evidently know little of the subject, and understand even less of the little you have some inkling of -- feel the need to demonstrate to me -- I think fair to say, one of the more knowledgeable monks with regard to threading -- just how useless your home-spun wisdom fairy stories on this subject, as with so many others, really are? Are you hoping to help me? Or help the OP? Or to ingratiate yourself with me in particular or the monks in general?
Explain how that was "rational, logical refutation of bad information"?
--Dave
In reply to Re^6: Problem handling 2 simultaneous socket streams
by armstd
in thread Problem handling 2 simultaneous socket streams
by PhillyR
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |