See update at EOM.
Hi monks,
I just lately started to OOPify the module I've been working on when I decided I'd go the full hog and Mooseify it.
Before, I was using something like this as a shorthand in the parser to make a node of some type:
sub new_node { my ($kind, @args) = @_; do { no strict 'refs'; my $class = "Erlang::Parser::Node::$kind"; &{"${class}::new"}($class, @args) } }
I'm not sure if this is ideal (if not, please do tell!), but it's even less ideal now as I'm getting this with Moose:
Undefined subroutine &Erlang::Parser::Node::Atom::new called at lib/Erlang/Parser/Parser.yp line 33, <DATA> line 1.If I call new as an actual OO call on the module, it works fine:
my $a = Erlang::Parser::Node::Atom->new(atom => 'xyz'); # sure thingI'm guessing this is because I don't actually define a new in my own classes (and leave that to Moose), so Erlang::Parser::Node::Whatever::new really doesn't exist!
There is probably some Moose magic I'm missing that I could use to get around this, but I'm still looking! Any wisdom would be very appreciated.
Anneli
Update: ooo... kay. Apparently I missed the most obvious solution of all:
sub new_node { my ($kind, %args) = @_; "Erlang::Parser::Node::$kind"->new(%args); }
I have much to learn.
In reply to Making a new object of an undecided class with Moose by anneli
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |