No. Where did you get that idea from?
From Re^12: aXML vs TT2 (Solution 3). It implies that "Rock & Roll" produces "Rock & Roll" (which is invalid XML). Now you tell me that's not the case. Could you fill in the blanks in the following table so I can understand.
| In aXML template | Output by aXML | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| < | < | Re^12: aXML vs TT2 (Solution 3) |
| > | > | Re^12: aXML vs TT2 (Solution 3) |
| & | & | Re^18: aXML vs TT2 |
| ??? | > | |
| ??? | < | |
| ??? | & |
In reply to Re^19: aXML vs TT2
by ikegami
in thread aXML vs TT2
by Logicus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |