Thanks for that - I've done as you suggested and subclassed it, and that works fine as a patch for now. Hopefully the callbacks from the 3rd party provider will get more intelligent on encodings. Would be nice if there was a neat way of being a little less strict in Catalyst itself though.
In reply to Re: Using alternative encodings for specific Catalyst actions
by JohannShunt
in thread Using alternative encodings for specific Catalyst actions
by JohannShunt
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |