That isn't fair. You know what the issue is and it isn't right to try push it back on the OP to demonstrate the performance overhead of Moose.
Every time someone is surprised by the overhead of Moose in small short lived programs we seem to reply in the following sequence (where each one is admitted more grudgingly):
Perhaps it would be more honest if we replied in the reverse order.
--
John.
In reply to Re^2: Moose performance
by jmcnamara
in thread Moose performance
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |