Thanks for the pointer. I must admit that thread somehow happened to sneak out from under my radar :)
Personally, I would consider it more "natural" if an if-construct without an else clause (when used in an "expression context") would sematically behave more like a ternary cond ? ... : undef (instead of cond ? ... : cond), but if you look at it from the perspective of what is evaluated last, it's of course perfectly clear why things behave as they do.
(Yes, I'm aware that if-constructs in Perl - unlike in some other languages - don't evaluate to anything itself (as a whole), i.e. they are not expressions — so no need to comment on that.)
In reply to Re^4: if block inside map
by Eliya
in thread if block inside map
by mhearse
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |