When I first looked at the TIOBE methodology some years ago, all they did was searching google, yahoo and the microsoft search engine (precursor to bing) for "$language programming" and counted the matches, and did some kind of averaging.
Needless to say that this correlates only very, very weakly with the actual popularity of the language.
I believe that TIOBE now uses more sources, but IMHO the stigma of unscientific approach and FUD still sticks to their "data".
In reply to Re^4: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!
by moritz
in thread Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!
by lblake
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |