I'd consider it in terms of release cycle. If all the modules have the same release cycle I'd be strongly inclined to use the same version number. If the release cycles for the individual modules are sensibly disjoint I'd be inclined to use different version numbers. However if the modules are related (by API definition perhaps) but may have disjoint release cycles I'd use a major.minor.point version number scheme where interface changes imply at least a matching minor version bump across the suite and point bumps for individual module releases.
In reply to Re^7: (solved) Clean smoke-test install for Inline based modules using Inline::MakeMaker
by GrandFather
in thread Clean smoke-test install for Inline based modules using Inline::MakeMaker
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |