Hi Jethro,
and the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42 ;)
I was wondering why the implementations differ, as well as seeking an ellegant way to get the behaviour I wanted. If s///; returned a list of the items sub'd out then it would be easy enough to use that in scalar contect to have the number. Felt rather un-Perlish to miss out on potential utility.
Cheers,
R.
In reply to Re^2: s///g and capturing all matches
by Random_Walk
in thread s///g and capturing all matches
by Random_Walk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |