And then there's 1..100_000 that creates an array and 100,000 scalars at compile-time.
It does? How can you tell?
Neither B::Deparse nor B::Concise seem to indicate that, nor the compile time memory consumption.
In reply to Re^4: Why is const x const not a const?
by moritz
in thread Why is const x const not a const?
by PerlGrey
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |