It shows up as const AV in the opcode tree.
You can prove the list is flattened once using
for (1..2) { for ((), 4..8) { say $_++; } }
Update: Added missing parens.
In reply to Re^5: Why is const x const not a const?
by ikegami
in thread Why is const x const not a const?
by PerlGrey
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |