It shows up as const AV in the opcode tree.
You can prove the list is flattened once using
for (1..2) { for ((), 4..8) { say $_++; } }
Update: Added missing parens.
In reply to Re^5: Why is const x const not a const?
by ikegami
in thread Why is const x const not a const?
by PerlGrey
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |