I know that the array is there, but that doesn't convince me that those 100k scalars are built at compile time. There might just as well be a magic initializer attached to it that generates them at runtime, or at closure cloning time or whenever.
No matter how big I chose the number in the range, I can't see increased memory consumption at compile time, which is why i suspect they aren't created at compile time.
In reply to Re^8: Why is const x const not a const?
by moritz
in thread Why is const x const not a const?
by PerlGrey
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |