Pdf from the point 1 doesn't provide enough information to make any assumptions regarding relative performance of DES and SHA512.
If you cannot not read a simple graph, then this discussion is pointless.
(Notice also the highlighted text: ... the most secure function, SHA-512, is also the fastest of four investigated hash functions. ")
And nothing is "made up". It is all laid out for you to read for yourself. If you are incapable of doing so despite the lengths I have gone to make it possible for you to verify every single bloody step, then fine. Bury your *&*&$%$£^ head in the sand.
In reply to Re^13: SaltedDigest Salt?
by BrowserUk
in thread SaltedDigest Salt?
by packetstormer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |