If you're more use to working in a GUI environment, then ActivePerl might be your best bet. If you're happy with working on the commandline, then Strawberry Perl might suit you better.
I was with you right up until the above paragraph. I exclusively use the command line for perl and C/C++ development. I see absolutely nothing in Active State Perl that requires, nor even encourages using a "GUI environment".
In fact, other than the PPM GUI -- which I have always eshewed in favour of the also installed command line alternative: ppm-shell -- there are no GUI components in Active State Perl. So, why do you think you have to be a GUI user to use Active State Perl?
In reply to Re^2: Which is better: ActiveState or Strawberry Perl?
by BrowserUk
in thread Which is better: ActiveState or Strawberry Perl?
by Eldan Aranye
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |