I wouldn't conflate the two purposes. The spell-corrector on its own might have some value, but adding chomp functionality to it diminishes its generality. Also, what is the use case for a return value consisting of the number of words corrected plus the number of characters that chomp removed?
The spell-corrector itself is a big leap of faith. I find that spell-checkers frequently guess incorrectly, particularly in documents that contain a mixture of prose and code or other technical text. While it might be great for the simple case, it's hard to imagine what that simple case would be.
Dave
In reply to Re: RFC: Best name for this module?
by davido
in thread RFC: Best name for this module?
by tobyink
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |