As already noted, it's not actually done "character by character".
No, it was (correctly) said that skipping the leading non-number part isn't done at all.
If it were done that way 'nanosecond' == 'nanosecond' and 'informal' == 'formal' would both be true.
They are both true even though it's not done that way, so that's a useless statement.
In reply to Re^3: Definition of numerically equal and rationale for 'you' == 'me'
by ikegami
in thread Definition of numerically equal and rationale for 'you' == 'me'
by andreas1234567
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |