Want dispatches based on immediate context, whereas Contextual::Return dispatches based on first use. Example:
#!/usr/bin/perl use warnings; use strict; use Contextual::Return; use Want; sub foo_want { if (want('HASH')) { return { foo => "bar" } } else { return "Hello" } } sub foo_ctx { return HASHREF { { foo => "bar" } } DEFAULT { "Hello" } } print foo_ctx()->{foo}, "\n"; print foo_want()->{foo}, "\n"; my $ctx = foo_ctx(); my $want = foo_want(); print $ctx->{foo}, "\n"; print $want->{foo}, "\n";
And the result
$ perl /tmp/test.pl bar bar bar Can't use string ("Hello") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at + /tmp/test.pl line 22.
In the second case, Want "fails" because it was not called in hashref context.
Note: rreturn only needed in :lvalue subs
Update: Showed that the want code works when used inline.
Good Day,
Dean
In reply to Re: Contextual::Return and Want, any major difference?
by duelafn
in thread Contextual::Return and Want, any major difference?
by mascip
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |