What I'd like to propose is that we are "in this together". I'm now the owner of E2, so I share real financial liability with any security holes that ecore code in general might possess, plus we are going to share the same classes of problems. I'm actively developing engine improvements, including security, and I'm hoping that you can benefit from my work. For my end, I could use the extra hand in making things work and reviewing changes that go in; my site is writers, not coders.
My proposal for the path forward looks like this: I'm about to sign up at github for a recurring private repository setup because I don't want to be in the business of providing and maintaining my source control infrastructure, and I need at least one private repository for my configuration information. I need more than one contributor for my primary team, so it's only a $5/mo jump to a 10 collaborator plan with 20 repositories.
We can work out a trusted team from your group to go through things in the private repos and really prep them (with the ecore tools), and design a path forward to get to a place where you feel comfortable that the code is secure. Ideally we can find a way to merge the two engine bases again and move forward from there.
I'm hoping to reduce barriers to contribution by reducing the difficulty for development by pre-packaging the environment with Vagrant, hopefully by sharing the same chef recipes as production, only pared down
Lastly, by trolling the logs, do you mean checking the everything.errlog (or its equivalent), and making sure that errors are squashed?
Let me know how you feel about it, either here or over email.In reply to Re^6: Everything2 github repository and being of value to perlmonks (security of obscurity)
by JayBonci
in thread Everything2 github repository and being of value to perlmonks
by JayBonci
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |