efficiency? Your usual choices are usually valid, but would you consider them the best measure of the "efficiency" of producing a one-off or rarely used program? Being concerned solely with "cpu and timeUpdate1 consumption" and ignoring "programmer time" might be a serious case of premature optimization.
Update 1: I assume from context that the "time" reference meant "run time."
In reply to Re^3: Populating a hash
by ww
in thread Populating a hash
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |