At the root of the matter, rand() is not random and has a odd,even,odd,even bias - or at least common implementations do. There are better "pseudo random number generators" than rand(). They are much more computationally expensive and I think outside of the scope of this thread.
In reply to Re^2: What I am missing here
by Marshall
in thread What I am missing here
by heatblazer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |