I installed DBD::XBase and gave it a try. It works much better than the previous two modules. Especially for correct interpretation of field types.
I am still scratching my head around how to get a list of field types but I'll read the module source and see what is being passed back.
Cheers
In reply to Re^2: Which xBase module?
by parser
in thread Which xBase module?
by parser
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |