I don't get either "Oh No!" comments.
Then $rec{NOTE} exists, but contains a value other than "Beware!".
But with Nested Hashes I still get the intermediate hash autovivified
The following contains a dereference:
$rec{NOTE}{Nested}
You could have written it as follows:
$rec{NOTE}->{Nested}
If you factor in autovivification, then the above is equivalent to the following:
( $rec{NOTE} //= {} )->{Nested}
To get autovivified, $rec{NOTE} has to be undefined (or nonexistent), which is consistent with what we already knew (existent and not equal to "Beware!").
By the way, that means (1) would have given you a warning if you had warnings on as you should.
use strict; use warnings; no warnings 'void'; my %rec; printf "exists: %s\n", exists($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "defined: %s\n", defined($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "true: %s\n", $rec{NOTE} ?1:0; print "--\n"; $rec{NOTE} = undef; printf "exists: %s\n", exists($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "defined: %s\n", defined($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "true: %s\n", $rec{NOTE} ?1:0; print "--\n"; $rec{NOTE}{Nested}; printf "exists: %s\n", exists($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "defined: %s\n", defined($rec{NOTE}) ?1:0; printf "true: %s\n", $rec{NOTE} ?1:0;
exists: 0 defined: 0 true: 0 -- exists: 1 defined: 0 true: 0 -- exists: 1 defined: 1 true: 1
In reply to Re: gotchas with hash element autovivification
by ikegami
in thread gotchas with hash element autovivification
by raybies
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |