I'd estimate that on average...That's not scientific rigor.

How does "I'd estimate" suggest "scientific rigor"?

It doesn't. Strawman.

... the blanket acceptance... You're putting words in sundial's post.

No. Fairly summarising his own words: "software professionals all".

Seems fair to me to assume that a software professional will use professional judgment

Resisting the urge to hoist you with your own unscientific petard, your assumption flies in the face of the evidence: "software professionals all".

You further compound that by leaping to the defense of the indefensible.

In reply to Re^4: Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules by Anonymous Monk
in thread Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules by miketosh

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.