Strings are simply interpreted as package names when you call a method on them. This is how Foo->new works in the first place.
D'oh! Of course! I even use that behavior on occasion.
Thanks for the reminder.
In reply to Re^2: strings->can->isa but numbers->can't?
by djerius
in thread strings->can->isa but numbers->can't?
by djerius
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |