As such, they would be more expressions than ideas.
I believe the output of mechanical processes isn't covered by Copyright either.
I don't see an API as a "fact".
An API is the knowledge of what methods are available, how to call them and what they do. How is that not fact?
In reply to Re^2: Copyright on languages
by ikegami
in thread Copyright on languages
by ikegami
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |