It adds generality beyond three strings to compare.
I might give you that if you wrote it that way. for ($b, $c) isn't any more general than my single statement. We'd both have to go change our code if we suddenly had to compare 4 strings.
So what do you suggest instead? Your usage of $bits isn't any better, because you don't care about bits, but bytes.
I'm not suggesting it's a good name for anything more than a throwaway example, but I wouldn't say it isn't any better. I do actually care about bits as I'm using it with bitwise operators. And the real point is that calling it $mask implies that you intend to use it as a mask. When you don't, confusion results.
In reply to Re^4: Is it possible to find the number of matching and non-matching positions in strings using perl code?
by sauoq
in thread Is it possible to find the number of matching and non-matching positions in strings using perl code?
by supriyoch_2008
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |