Hmmm, I'm surprised. I figured at a million strings that the Schwartzian Transform would win. But you show another good lesson: Measure, don't guess. While both you and I expected the transform to win at a million strings, measurement trumps expectation.
...roboticus
When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.
In reply to Re^3: Date to be sorted in descending and time in ascending
by roboticus
in thread Date to be sorted in descending and time in ascending
by karthik7887
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |