Here's my output (from bleadperl): 
Benchmark: running F_plus, F_sexeger, F_while, P_plus, P_sexeger, P_wh
+ile, each for at least 5 CPU seconds...
    F_plus:  6 wallclock secs ( 5.38 usr +  0.02 sys =  5.40 CPU) @ 38
+010.19/s (n=205255)
 F_sexeger:  6 wallclock secs ( 5.19 usr +  0.00 sys =  5.19 CPU) @ 82
+085.16/s (n=426022)
   F_while:  5 wallclock secs ( 5.23 usr +  0.00 sys =  5.23 CPU) @ 99
+934.23/s (n=522656)
    P_plus:  6 wallclock secs ( 5.22 usr +  0.00 sys =  5.22 CPU) @ 34
+659.58/s (n=180923)
 P_sexeger:  7 wallclock secs ( 5.11 usr +  0.00 sys =  5.11 CPU) @ 54
+039.53/s (n=276142)
   P_while:  6 wallclock secs ( 5.14 usr +  0.00 sys =  5.14 CPU) @ 58
+260.31/s (n=299458)
              Rate   P_plus   F_plus P_sexeger P_while F_sexeger F_whi
+le
P_plus     34660/s       --      -9%      -36%    -41%      -58%    -6
+5%
F_plus     38010/s      10%       --      -30%    -35%      -54%    -6
+2%
P_sexeger  54040/s      56%      42%        --     -7%      -34%    -4
+6%
P_while    58260/s      68%      53%        8%      --      -29%    -4
+2%
F_sexeger  82085/s     137%     116%       52%     41%        --    -1
+8%
F_while    99934/s     188%     163%       85%     72%       22%      
+--

[download]
The F stands for "fail", and the P stands for "pass". For me, the while-approach fails AND succeeds faster than the sexeger- and plus-approaches, and sexeger fails AND succeeds faster than the plus-approach.

And here's the code I ran. 

#!/usr/bin/perl

use Benchmark 'cmpthese';

my $X = "a b c d e f g h i j k l ";
my $Y = "a b c d e f g h i j k l";

cmpthese(-5, {
  P_while => sub {
    my $x = $X;
    1 while $x =~ s/\s$//;
  },
  P_plus => sub {
    my $x = $X;
    $x =~ s/\s+$//;
  },
  P_sexeger => sub {
    my $x = reverse $X;
    $x =~ s/^\s+//;
    $x = reverse $x;
  },

  F_while => sub {
    my $x = $Y;
    1 while $x =~ s/\s$//;
  },
  F_plus => sub {
    my $x = $Y;
    $x =~ s/\s+$//;
  },
  F_sexeger => sub {
    my $x = reverse $Y;
    $x =~ s/^\s+//;
    $x = reverse $x;
  },
});

[download]

_____________________________________________________
Jeff japhy Pinyan: Perl, regex, and perl hacker.
s++=END;++y(;-P)}y js++=;shajsj<++y(p-q)}?print:??;

In reply to Re: Re: japhy blabs about regexes (again) by japhy
in thread japhy blabs about regexes (again) by japhy

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.