It was implied that you actually use DBI. Unless you want to add DBD::mysql as well, if you really want to.
But you're missing the point of my post. The OP was asking about whether Mysql.pm or DBI.pm is better. I said that DBD::mysql was the better option, and anyone who has just skimmed the DBI documentation knows that the drivers reside in the DBD::* modules.
In reply to Re^3: use Mysql; vs. use DBI;
by thomas895
in thread use Mysql; vs. use DBI;
by quikk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |