I said "the passage you quoted does not appear anywhere in the spec", emphasis added.
I see. So you just popped up to tell me that the text I quoted from one (linked)document, doesn't appear in some other (unreferenced) document?
Sound!
And by "the passage", I really meant any reference to being a text format at all.
Really? Then I guess you missed section "2.2 Characters" of "the spec": That I both linked and quoted elsewhere.
2.2 Characters [Definition: A parsed entity contains text, a sequence of characters, +which may represent markup or character data.] [Definition: A charact +er is an atomic unit of text as specified by ISO/IEC 10646:2000 [ISO/ +IEC 10646]. Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and + the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. The versions of t +hese standards cited in A.1 Normative References were current at the +time this document was prepared. New characters may be added to these + standards by amendments or new editions. Consequently, XML processor +s MUST accept any character in the range specified for Char. ]
In reply to Re^11: Native newline encoding
by BrowserUk
in thread Native newline encoding
by salva
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |