if they had declared it like this:
sub isa() { ... }then they could have prevented this widespread misuse of the API.
How so (even if protoypes did work with methods)?
Wouldn't the effect rather be that you could now no longer call it as a method, nor with any parameter?
In reply to Re: Good use for prototypes. On methods no less!
by Eliya
in thread Good use for prototypes. On methods no less!
by polymorpheus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |