I don't get what you mean here. qw/ac qw/ and qw/ca qw/ are treated identically by the flip-flop operator:
Yes, I know that. Also the description on perldoc seems clear if you already know what to expect. My whole point is that the result of perl -we'my @l = qw/ca qw/; for (@l) { print if /a/../c/ }' is not logical.
Suppose that I want to process html file where I have tags like this:
If my flip-flop condition is /<tag>/../<\/tag>/ it would print<tag> a </tag><tag> b </tag><tag> c
which is not what you want. With three dots you get<tag> a </tag><tag> </tag><tag>
still not good :(<tag> a </tag><tag> </tag><tag> c </tag>
Basically, what I originally (and incorrectly as I see now) expected from this operator was that it processes each element char by char (as a real flip-flop) and not as a whole. Of course, in my html example I can first format the file but that is another story.
BTW: I am new here and have a question about writeup formatting. How do you cite someone's text if it contains a code? Copy-pasting and than manually putting those code tags back (which I did) seems pretty tedious.
In reply to Re^4: Scalar range operator again
by kejv2
in thread Scalar range operator again
by kejv2
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |