The first snippet is clear. So is the second, which I verified, extracts the first 4 bytes into a single variable. I do not understand your output in this case 'vzI&#..'

Your example now makes the C template clear - it works differently in the sense that the number that follows the C is the number of octets to extract rather than number of octets to combine into a single variable.

I missed this in the docs, if it is mentioned there. Is this behaviour unique to C? Again I could not find it in the docs. If you used the docs to figure this out, I would appreciate a pointer to the section

In reply to Re^4: How do unpack templates work by unlinker
in thread How do unpack templates work by unlinker

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.