I ran on the assumption that it is the random number generator failing only for the hash seeding code -- hence downplaying the problem. I have no idea which RNG the actual rand() function uses, but password/session key generation can be made reasonably secure even with a nonfunctional RNG.
To the OP: What sort of results do you get if you run perl -le 'print rand() for 1..10' on the faulty boards? If you run it twice, will the same sequence repeat? What about on the working boards?
In reply to Re^5: Your random numbers are not that random (UtS,L)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Your random numbers are not that random
by davies
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |