The second hash was a matter of expedience based on the incredibly limited amount of time I had to get a change done and in SCM. It fell deep into the land of "unforgiveable mess that I could be absolutely confident about, thereby making the business customer happy as a clam."
As my business customer is hands down the best one I've EVER had in my career I was able to have the "ok I can get this in for tomorrow. But that means that you get no changes next week while I fix what I had to do to do this" conversation with him. A condition which, along with the desperation on my face, compelled him to concede to.
In reply to Re^2: A question of style: Composite keys to multiple values
by Voronich
in thread A question of style: Composite keys to multiple values
by Voronich
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |