I prefer: 1) Don't use tools that make subroutines having the same names as classes. 2) Don't use tools (like old base.pm) that silently ignore failures when you try to require a module.
But since I find Moose so strongly pushes toward bad class design (and MooseX::Declare leads to obscure errors and days wasted debugging), not using them is no hardship for me anyway. :)
- tye
In reply to Re^4: MooseX obscure error and importance of Unit Testing (tools)
by tye
in thread MooseX obscure error and importance of Unit Testing
by greengaroo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |