Yes, but it performed slightly worse than xz, most likely because it uses the same compression algorithm.
-rw-r--r-- 1 469K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.7z -rw-r--r-- 1 559K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 559K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 468K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 560K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.zip # Uncompressed file, packed with Csss/CLsss: -rw-r--r-- 1 701K 10 Sep 18:34 accel_packed.dat
These are all about +/- 10%. Unless there's a significantly different and amazing general compression algorithm I haven't considered, I would imagine these results won't improve much, which is why I'm asking here to see if there's a way I can further optimize the data itself.
In reply to Re^2: Specialized data compression
by wanna_code_perl
in thread Specialized data compression
by wanna_code_perl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |