And finally, this
-- but your way of asking questions that provokes replies that you don't like.
Shows this
-- I don't understand how the privilege to post a reply to your question can be considered misuse. But why do you think I would need it to see through the "sham of anonimity"?
to be either the pretence of misunderstanding or a deliberate attempt at misdirection.
A truly Anonymous Monk can only ever post one question.
For you to assert that you have devined a pattern in the style of "questions" from an Anonymous Monk is absurd. One does not a pattern make.
So, to talk of "questions", and imply a pattern, you must associate this question, with previous questions assumed or known to be from the same source. You are not normally the assumptive kind, so the logical conclusion is that Co-rion crossed-referenced the IP of this Anonymous Monk with that of some logged-in user.
That's *misused privilege*.
Or maybe, you were informed by some other abusive God. Either way.
In reply to Re^12: Scope::Upper localize?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Scope::Upper localize?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |