I, too, would be inclined toward something like the initial form of the code given in the OP for reasons of readability and maintainability. However, here's another way to glue everything together:
>perl -wMstrict -le "my @ranges = ('15', '28-31', '3-4', '40', '17-19'); my ($total_min, $total_max); ;; m{ \A (\d+) (?{ $total_min += $^N }) (?: - (\d+))? (?{ $total_max += $^N }) \z }xmsg for @ranges; ;; print qq{total between $total_min and $total_max}; " total between 103 and 109
Update:
I would much prefer to be able to write the whole body of the of loop in the above example in the form:
$total_min += SELF_CONTAINED_FUNCTIONAL_STATEMENT;
$total_max += SELF_CONTAINED_FUNCTIONAL_STATEMENT;
This seems to come a bit closer to what smls asked for (but I like BrowserUk's solution better!) and has a bit of input validation:
perl -wMstrict -le "my @ranges = qw(15 28-31 3-4 40 17-19 99- -99 -99- x x-x); my ($total_min, $total_max); ;; my $extract_ranges = qr{ \A (\d+) (?: - (\d+))? \z }xms; for (@ranges) { $total_min += /$extract_ranges/ && $1; $total_max += /$extract_ranges/ && $^N; } ;; print qq{total between $total_min and $total_max}; " total between 103 and 109
(Update: Now that I look back on this thread, my second approach looks rather like kennethk's first idea.)
In reply to Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
by AnomalousMonk
in thread Is there a more functional regex syntax?
by smls
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |